|
|
| Winner? |
| Patriots |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Seahawks |
|
75% |
[ 3 ] |
| Dont Care |
|
25% |
[ 1 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 4 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Hercules
Group: Multi Account No Pm
Joined: 24 Feb 2009
Posts: 17
Gold: Locked
Status:
Warn: 
Reputation: 0
|
 #1 Posted: 26 Jan 2015 03:24 am Post subject: Thoughts on the superbowl? |
 |
|
With all the media swarming around the patriots deflate gate scandal, does anything think this will ruin the patriots legacy? Would it be more focused on BB or Tom Brady?
_____________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Seahawks
Group: Members
Joined: 03 Feb 2015
Posts: 124
Gold: 12.10
Status:
Warn:
Reputation: 0
|
| #2 Posted: 03 Feb 2015 10:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Definitely Seahawks.
Patriots cheated all their way to get into the Super Bowl.
I definitely wasn't happy with the outcome, but ofc NFL won't do anything about it.
Really pissed... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Hercules
Group: Multi Account No Pm
Joined: 24 Feb 2009
Posts: 17
Gold: Locked
Status:
Warn:
Reputation: 0
|
| #3 Posted: 04 Feb 2015 06:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Seahawks wrote: | Definitely Seahawks.
Patriots cheated all their way to get into the Super Bowl.
I definitely wasn't happy with the outcome, but ofc NFL won't do anything about it.
Really pissed... |
The seahawks failed the most drug tests this year in the NFL. Don't go to far in your claims on cheating. Realistically all of the teams would do anything to give them the edge. I am not even close to a Patriots fan but the deflated balls didn't impact the defense letting blount look like a HoFer.
_____________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Seahawks
Group: Members
Joined: 03 Feb 2015
Posts: 124
Gold: 12.10
Status:
Warn:
Reputation: 0
|
| #4 Posted: 09 Feb 2015 07:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Hercules wrote: | | Seahawks wrote: | Definitely Seahawks.
Patriots cheated all their way to get into the Super Bowl.
I definitely wasn't happy with the outcome, but ofc NFL won't do anything about it.
Really pissed... |
The seahawks failed the most drug tests this year in the NFL. Don't go to far in your claims on cheating. Realistically all of the teams would do anything to give them the edge. I am not even close to a Patriots fan but the deflated balls didn't impact the defense letting blount look like a HoFer. |
I wish I could find this article again, but I can't find it.
There was an article that came out maybe two or three days before the Super Bowl game. It talked about how the Patriots stopped having fumbles once the rules were changed back in... 2008? I think... the rules which allowed the teams to bring their own footballs.
Because of this rule change, the Patriots were able to deflate their balls and therefore grip them better, thus reducing the number of fumbles. Statistics showed that their number of fumbles did skydive to almost none. Before this rule change, their number of fumbles were something like 1 out of 70 throws or something like that. Pretty average and similar to other teams.
That is, to me, evidence of cheating. IMO |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Hercules
Group: Multi Account No Pm
Joined: 24 Feb 2009
Posts: 17
Gold: Locked
Status:
Warn:
Reputation: 0
|
| #5 Posted: 11 Feb 2015 12:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Seahawks wrote: | | Hercules wrote: | | Seahawks wrote: | Definitely Seahawks.
Patriots cheated all their way to get into the Super Bowl.
I definitely wasn't happy with the outcome, but ofc NFL won't do anything about it.
Really pissed... |
The seahawks failed the most drug tests this year in the NFL. Don't go to far in your claims on cheating. Realistically all of the teams would do anything to give them the edge. I am not even close to a Patriots fan but the deflated balls didn't impact the defense letting blount look like a HoFer. |
I wish I could find this article again, but I can't find it.
There was an article that came out maybe two or three days before the Super Bowl game. It talked about how the Patriots stopped having fumbles once the rules were changed back in... 2008? I think... the rules which allowed the teams to bring their own footballs.
Because of this rule change, the Patriots were able to deflate their balls and therefore grip them better, thus reducing the number of fumbles. Statistics showed that their number of fumbles did skydive to almost none. Before this rule change, their number of fumbles were something like 1 out of 70 throws or something like that. Pretty average and similar to other teams.
That is, to me, evidence of cheating. IMO |
I read that article, its very alarming. Im sure there will be fallback on The Patriots dynasty after this even with the win. Thanks for reminding of that article 
_____________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sake
Group: VIP
Joined: 27 Jul 2010
Donor: 
Posts: 332
Gold: 1150.50
Clan: D3JSP
Status:
Warn:
Reputation: 1
|
| #6 Posted: 12 Feb 2015 11:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I did not follow this
_____________________
I only accept Interac as payment method. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Seahawks
Group: Members
Joined: 03 Feb 2015
Posts: 124
Gold: 12.10
Status:
Warn:
Reputation: 0
|
| #7 Posted: 16 Feb 2015 11:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Hercules wrote: | | Seahawks wrote: | | Hercules wrote: | | Seahawks wrote: | Definitely Seahawks.
Patriots cheated all their way to get into the Super Bowl.
I definitely wasn't happy with the outcome, but ofc NFL won't do anything about it.
Really pissed... |
The seahawks failed the most drug tests this year in the NFL. Don't go to far in your claims on cheating. Realistically all of the teams would do anything to give them the edge. I am not even close to a Patriots fan but the deflated balls didn't impact the defense letting blount look like a HoFer. |
I wish I could find this article again, but I can't find it.
There was an article that came out maybe two or three days before the Super Bowl game. It talked about how the Patriots stopped having fumbles once the rules were changed back in... 2008? I think... the rules which allowed the teams to bring their own footballs.
Because of this rule change, the Patriots were able to deflate their balls and therefore grip them better, thus reducing the number of fumbles. Statistics showed that their number of fumbles did skydive to almost none. Before this rule change, their number of fumbles were something like 1 out of 70 throws or something like that. Pretty average and similar to other teams.
That is, to me, evidence of cheating. IMO |
I read that article, its very alarming. Im sure there will be fallback on The Patriots dynasty after this even with the win. Thanks for reminding of that article |
I don't know about that (the fallback part). I am beginning to suspect that the NFL exposed this scandal on purpose to get more viewers for the SB. This appeared in the news shortly before the big game. But did they really not even notice something was up all these years that the Patriots cheated?
I guess I should put my tin foil hat on...  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Hercules
Group: Multi Account No Pm
Joined: 24 Feb 2009
Posts: 17
Gold: Locked
Status:
Warn:
Reputation: 0
|
| #8 Posted: 11 Mar 2015 12:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Seahawks wrote: | | Hercules wrote: | | Seahawks wrote: | | Hercules wrote: | | Seahawks wrote: | Definitely Seahawks.
Patriots cheated all their way to get into the Super Bowl.
I definitely wasn't happy with the outcome, but ofc NFL won't do anything about it.
Really pissed... |
The seahawks failed the most drug tests this year in the NFL. Don't go to far in your claims on cheating. Realistically all of the teams would do anything to give them the edge. I am not even close to a Patriots fan but the deflated balls didn't impact the defense letting blount look like a HoFer. |
I wish I could find this article again, but I can't find it.
There was an article that came out maybe two or three days before the Super Bowl game. It talked about how the Patriots stopped having fumbles once the rules were changed back in... 2008? I think... the rules which allowed the teams to bring their own footballs.
Because of this rule change, the Patriots were able to deflate their balls and therefore grip them better, thus reducing the number of fumbles. Statistics showed that their number of fumbles did skydive to almost none. Before this rule change, their number of fumbles were something like 1 out of 70 throws or something like that. Pretty average and similar to other teams.
That is, to me, evidence of cheating. IMO |
I read that article, its very alarming. Im sure there will be fallback on The Patriots dynasty after this even with the win. Thanks for reminding of that article |
I don't know about that (the fallback part). I am beginning to suspect that the NFL exposed this scandal on purpose to get more viewers for the SB. This appeared in the news shortly before the big game. But did they really not even notice something was up all these years that the Patriots cheated?
I guess I should put my tin foil hat on... |
I knew about it a few weeks before the game. I keep up with it closely though lol
_____________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
RPG
Arcade
FAQ/Rules
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Live Chat
Log in
Register
